Skip to main content

MCA: Glimpses of the Close-up

Glimpses of the Close-up

Recently, Tom Hooper who directed the film adaptation of the musical Les Miserables, came under the fire of negative and almost chastising criticism for the way he conducted his cinematography. The major blame was that he, not only used the close-up too often, but had his characters break the fourth wall by looking directly at the camera! Yet the movie went on to be nominated for Best Picture 2013. Tom Hooper, the very director accused of breaking the basics of cinematography, was the winner of the 2010 Oscar as Best Director for his movie The King's Speech.
Hooper gave a simple reaction to the fierce criticism. The close-up, he said, would better serve the emotional purpose behind it. To achieve intense attention from the audience. But no comment from him on whether he made too many close-up shots or not is to be found, as yet!
It is common artistic knowledge now, that the close-up is only one type of shot. That the long and medium shots are the mainstay in any filmic narrative. The long shot is the equivalent to the summary in fiction writing where we get description and explanations between scenes or moments of intense impact; where something similar to the close-up in a movie occurs in fiction. We also know that too many close-ups would make you squint or tilt your head to focus or even leave the theater. One cannot think of a whole movie made of close-up shots. But, guess what? I found out that the late John Cassavetes, the father of American independent filmmaking and the maker of The Dirty Dozen 1967, made Faces in 1968, predominantly in close-ups! Watch it free here.

I used to love Marlon Brando. My truly favorite actor. There were others such as Richard Widmarck, Monty Cleft, Robert Wagner and Burt Lancaster. I also loved those actors who did not shine enough to be stars such as John Erickson, George Chakiris, George Hamilton, Jeffery Hunter etc. Then there were those who were sidekicks to the main protagonist or otherwise slight villains. Such as Hardy Kruger, Horst Buchholtz ( note the bad sequence), Brandon De Wilde (Shane), and John Saxon. I loved John Saxon in the old John Huston movie The Unforgiven 1960.
There came a day when I heard both Saxon and Brando were in one Western movie! A big motivation for an unusual trip away from home. I went to see this movie, called The Appaloosa 1966, in the Coliseum cinema house (or movie theater)! I was very young and had to take a bus with a friend and cross a bridge over the river Nile to get to that movie theater. My excitement to see Brando with Saxon was so great that everything was worth it, including the remote sense of nausea that set in and was aggravated by the movie and that resided in me for days. The movie was completely unwatchable for me!

Furie, S.
The Canadian artist Sidney Furie,, who directed that movie, reckoned so much on the close-up shot. Brando, I learned later, was disinterested in the movie although he gave one of his finest performances (I confirmed this later). He, probably liked the close-up shots and was, obviously, repeating experience gained from his earlier cowboy movie. John Saxon was great and so was Emilio Fernandez. One thing about Brando, nobody acted bad if Brando was there. Remember Karl Malden, Ben Johnson, Katy Jurado and others in the cast for the film Brando himself directed, One-Eyed Jacks, they were all great.

Jurado, K.
 There was something wrong in watching close-ups on a wide screen, open-air cinema house. The close-ups in The Appaloosa felt so bad. I was turning my head restlessly, trying to keep myself from throwing up. And there was hand-wrestling on deadly scorpions. The guy who was with me denied that the movie gave him any adverse effects in the stomach. That was when I thought about the close-up shot, wondering where it fit. We discussed its value and otherwise in the bus back to our homes. I remember that I used some big words about how to shoot a good movie but the fact was that I knew nothing about shooting movies! Technically, I mean. Forget about calling it an extreme, a medium or just a close-up.
Furie did not invent the close-up as a charged moment in his visual narrative. It was started as a trend in Westerns by Sergio Leone and other Italian makers of Spaghetti Westerns!
Watch this clip to see how objects, not only human features, were brought forward into significance by various shots from Leone's movies.

Most people like close-up shots! Most actors crave for close-up shots.
The clip below was voted the best by many movie-goers. It depicts Nicole Kidman in one of her good performances:

Many great movie masters knew how to make close-ups memorable. A very special moment in film narrative where intensity overrides any other purpose for watching the movie. Here is an analysis of Hitchcok's usage of the close-up:

"I have never seen my life in focus", said the protagonist Sabzian in the Iranian filmmaker Kiarostami's nineteen ninety docufiction of 90-something-minutes widely acclaimed and titled the Close-Up. The protagonist Sabzian, in the quoted sentence above, referred to both his exposure to the technique of the close-up and to revealing his inner complexes, beliefs and aspirations. Kiarostami warned the actor, Sabzian who was playing himself in the movie, that he would use two types of cameras or lenses. Kiarostami, who is known for his mastery of the long shot, incredibly proves his loyalty to it in the closing scene of this intricate reenactment of real story. He proves the inclusive view of reality achieved by the long shot!


Kiarostami knows that the close-up is "a captured moment in the evolving document of life!" The movie Close-Up is memorable for the announced medium close-up which prevails during the court-room scene but also has other memorable close-ups such as the one in the bus, when Sabzian meets Mrs. Ahankhah, a fan of the film he was reading the script of, (The Cyclist). This is a very close and revealing sequence. Another memorable scene is when the filmmaker goes to see the arrested impersonator of movie-maker Makhmalbof (below). But Kiarostami likes the long shot better, as stated above. He suddenly pays attention to the fate of a can rolling down the steep alley and listens to the sounds it produces in its inevitable journey down the road. You can see a glimpse of smoke that vanishes in the contorted skyline of the city. This scene of the can serves as a nice salutation to the broad context of his film narrative; to the reality.

It is in the closing scene of Close-Up when the filmmaker achieves the sense of the real and near by shooting from afar; when the impersonated and the impersonator reconcile and are shown in their full sizes in a way as if Kiarostami wanted to relieve us from the intensity of the too close!
Watch Close-Up full and free on Youtube.


Popular posts from this blog

سؤال الضهبان

سؤال الضهبان
لا تظنن أنه سؤال هيّن! أو عليك أن تتأكد أن السائل لم يعد ضهبان. وحتى في هذه الحالة ربما لم يجد الجواب ولكنه فقط تحوّل من (الضهب) إلى حالة أحسن نسبياً ودون تفسير. أي سؤال هو ليس بالهيّن. وأي سؤال هو لم يُسأل عبثاً ولهوا. زي، يلاقيك زول ويسأل: كيف اصبحت؟ تجربة وجودية عديل كدا. طيب تعال شوف كمية التزوير في الجواب! طبعاً مافي زول بيجاوب على السؤال دا بالضبط كدا. كلنا تقريبين في السؤال دا وفي غيره من اسئلة كثيرة. الجواب هو المصطنع في أغلب الأحوال وليس السؤال! ياخي حتى السؤال الغبي، الواحد بيتمرمط أمامه. لذلك سؤال الضهبان دا هو موئل الغناء والشعر الكاذب والبطولات! ومن الناس من يحاول أن يغشك! إنهم أهل الاجابات الذين تتكوّر ذواتهم في نهايات الأسطر، مدلهّمة. نقطة سطر جديد! - هوي انت هه! يعني شايل ليك اجابة كدا وفرحان بيها، قايل السؤال مات!؟ دعني أقول لك: جميع الأسئلة التي سمعت والتي لم تسمع بها، جميعها تتمتع بخلود مطلق! السؤال فيهو حيوية والاجابة ديمة نايصة. السؤال بيخلع وجامد. الجواب هو ختة النَفَس، التقية من عصف المشاعر. السؤال، أي سؤال، فيهو قوة، فيهو شواظ وبيطقطق زي قندول عيش ريف معذّب. الاج…

جليد نساي، المقال كامللاً

جليد نسّاي
قراءة في رواية الرجل الخراب
تأليف عبد العزيز بركة ساكن بقلم مصطفى مدثر
الجزء الأول

أيها القارئ المرائي، يا شبيهي، يا أخي - بودلير، شاعر فرنسي الفكرة الرئيسة [عند إليوت] هي أننا، حتى ونحن ملزمون بأن نعي ماضوية الماضي..، لا نملك طريقة عادلة لحجر الماضي عن الحاضر. إن الماضي والحاضر متفاعمان، كلٌ يشي بالآخر ويوحي به، وبالمعنى المثالي كلياً الذي ينتويه إليوت ، فإن كلاً منهما يتعايش مع الآخر. ما يقترحه ت س  إليوت بإيجاز هو رؤيا للتراث الأدبي لا يوجهها كلياً التعاقب الزمني، رغم أنها تحترم هذا التعاقب. لا الماضي ولا الحاضر، ولا أي شاعر أو فنان، يملك معنىً كاملاً منفرداً- إدوارد سعيد، أستاذ الأدب الإنجليزي الطريق إلى الحقيقة يمر بأرض الوساوس - شانون برودي، عاملة صيدلية.

يبدو مفارقاً، بل غرائبياً، أن تُهرع  لقصيدة ت س إليوت (الأرض الخراب) كي تعينك على فهم استلهام عبد العزيز بركة ساكن لها في كتابة روايته القصيرة، الرجل الخراب. فالمفارقة هي أن القصيدة المكتوبة في 1922، وبما عُرف عنها من تعقيد ووعورة، تحتاج هي نفسها لعشرات الشروحات، لكونها مغرقة في الإحالات لتواريخ وثقافات وأديان، بل ولغات أ…

MovieGlobe: Japan's Version of Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and Juliet (2007) JapanOriginal Article by: Fateh Mirghani-Japan

I have just finished watching the masterpiece of Shakespeare” Romeo and Juliet “in its Japanese version.
The quality of the movie is great and the soundtrack, injected with a little Japanese folklore music, has given it a sensational dimension and Eastern fascination!
Basically, the theme of the movie remains the same as the original play, and that has been a particular Japanese notion in dealing with other nations’ cultural products. Part of the reason may lay in Japan's sensitivity to other nations’cultural products- given the long standing historical disputes with its neighbours, and part of it may lay in a fierce sense of homogeneity that has come to characterize Japan as an island nation-state since time immemorial. Thus the Japanese, unlike the Americans, don’t seem to have the temerity to ‘Japanize’ others’ cultural stuff. The movie “Renaissance man”  can be cited as an example of American boldness. The …