Skip to main content

The Imperialist Design of Khartoum

Article by: Muhsin Khalid

Part Five

The Mahdi in "Khartoum" is portrayed as a Ghoul, a black vampire whose guest room is noticeably occupied by jars filled with cut off heads, whose talk is threatening to kill women and children, every soul..!
The Amazigh in the "Gladiator" are shown as no different. They sip their wine from the skulls of messengers and mail deliverers who are not, by convention, to be killed.
In the movie "300" of 2006, the invading Persians come to fight the Spartans by an army from the underworld; an army of mirabilia; of exotic creatures as though bred from marine and some monster organisms which, in their onslaught in battle have children and women entangled in the cracks of their hoofs and under their folds, before they meet their doom.

In another Hollywood movie we are introduced to a Muslim terrorist. We cannot tell whether he is Palestinian or Egyptian because he uses both accents! He is on board of a ship in which missiles are being smuggled in the dark of the night. When the Americans approach the ship, the terrorist threatens them that he would blow up his mother's head.  The Americans save the innocent Western world from the abominable act of dealing with missiles (which are made in the western world,anyway!) by killing this terrorist. They also save the mother from dying at the hands of her evil son!
This is the image promoted to represent the Eastern in general and the Muslim in particular.  An image meant to be impressed in the minds worldwide.
Games and Gameloft 

Violent computer games are frequently designed to be set in battlefields in the Middle East. An innocent child in the West can spend long hours at the computer sniping at 'terrorists' in mid-eastern playgrounds: Iraq, Palestine, Somalia and Sudan.
He is poisoned and prepared by this early-age indoctrination to become biased against 'the mad and bloody' East. One such game-making company is Gameloft which deserves to have its products studied seriously and objectively.
What is purported as Western civilization has always been based on invasion, captivity and contested expansion on borders. In spite of this, the West is civilized and the rest are barbarians and blood-shedding savages! As mentioned earlier this word 'barbarian' was  invented in the old days to describe people not living within the walls of Rome.
Africa has no place in the Western mentality except as a savage land inhabited by carnivores who feed on human flesh and drink their toasts in human skulls. But it should be borne in mind that this poor Africa has often been on the defensive against Western attacks!

Kings of the World (The Kushites)

{Word reached the Assyrians that the Egyptian army, led by king Tirhakah of Sudan, was coming to attack them.} the Bible, Kings. {Black warriors coming from the land of Kush raise panic.} Bible, Kings, Kushite.
The Bible refers to rare incidents in the very old history of kingdoms when some African kings and emperors invaded West Africa. Some of these kings are grandparents to the Mahdi, the subject of mockery in this movie. For the Mahdi is a Kushite as per the ancient history and a Nubian in modern terms. 
His grandparents were the kings Amani Pia also known as Bianchi and his counterpart Taharqa or Tirhaka, both known as members of the "Twenty-Fifth Dynasty,"  which ruled old Sudan and Egypt, They were also known as "kings of the world".
All these historical events took place tens of centuries before Christ!
What injustice and what partiality from secular intellectuals living on the eve of the twenty-first century!
Partiality breeds Biased Descriptions
In battle, the British artillery never miss. They always hit with precision both Mahdist horsemen and infantry. On the other hand, when the Mahdi fighters aim their guns carefully they hit and ruin buildings unrelated to the battle! It is not a surrealistic destruction that is intended to create a new reality. It is just to say that while civilized Westerners build, these ignorant mobs destroy!
Before shifting to the narrator of the movie who will verbally confirm this reading, it is worth stressing that, upon the entry of the mobs into Gordon's palace, his aide hands him his sword but Gordon takes a cane instead. Interpret this as sheep to the shepherd are like the Mahdists to Gordon!
It is funny that the Mahdists who were ruthlessly crushed by the guns outside the palace, come to back up on seeing the cane in Gordon's hand! He stands on the top of the stairway while they retreat down to the bottom step. Below him. Underneath him. We have observed and followed this since that scene of the meeting of the Mahdi with Gordon when the Mahdi is shown as having a much shorter stature than Gordon.
We observe this here and will observe it later on when we 'read' the statue of Gordon mounting a camel way above all the people of Sudan.
King Tiharqa
The River War by Winston Churchill

"Khartoum" is a movie that is densely populated by comic and Mirabiliac reality. The men at the bottom of the stairway who backed up on seeing a cane are the very people who are described in real dairies of imperialism as "the bravest that walked on earth", a term yet to be carefully verified. They are the very men we are told about by Winston Churchill who had been a military correspondent in Sudan at that time before he later became the Prime Minister of Britain and the winner of the Nobel Peace Prize!
Invaders should reap dynamite not prizes! 
Churchill (Nobel for Peace)
In his book "The River War", Churchill describes various races and origins in Sudan but settles down on two distinct categories. The Kushites or Negroids, blacker than 'coal'. A comic but racist expression derived from how Western mythology perceives black. The other category he calls the Arab settlers in Sudan.
Churchill emphasizes the stereotyped image of the African at large and the black Africans specifically.
His descriptive imagination does not leave the box that negates people not within the walls of Rome and labels them 'barbarians'.
Churchill does not miss out on clarifying the picture of the Mahdists in light of their counterparts, their fellow country men, the barbarians using the same mind-set which propagates barbarism as a standard, a yardstick as it is rooted, unfortunately in the Western mind.
Nevertheless, Churchill shies away from calling the Arab-Kushite entity of the Mahdists cowards. In fact he attributes to them such qualities as strength, manhood, decision, courage and integrity. All these qualities are passed along with many ethnic and religious name-calling. Yet, he denies any description of the Mahdists that resembles how this movie shows them.
Here is a quote from his book 'The River War':

"The Soudanese are of many tribes, but two main races can be clearly distinguished: the aboriginal natives, and the Arab settlers. The indigenous inhabitants of the country were negroes as black as coal. Strong, virile, and simple-minded savages, they lived as we may imagine prehistoric men--hunting, fighting, marrying, and dying,
with no ideas beyond the gratification of their physical desires, and no fears save those engendered by ghosts, witchcraft, the worship of ancestors, and other forms of superstition common among peoples of low development. They displayed the virtues of barbarism. They were brave and honest."

End of Part Five. MK.


Popular posts from this blog

سؤال الضهبان

سؤال الضهبان
لا تظنن أنه سؤال هيّن! أو عليك أن تتأكد أن السائل لم يعد ضهبان. وحتى في هذه الحالة ربما لم يجد الجواب ولكنه فقط تحوّل من (الضهب) إلى حالة أحسن نسبياً ودون تفسير. أي سؤال هو ليس بالهيّن. وأي سؤال هو لم يُسأل عبثاً ولهوا. زي، يلاقيك زول ويسأل: كيف اصبحت؟ تجربة وجودية عديل كدا. طيب تعال شوف كمية التزوير في الجواب! طبعاً مافي زول بيجاوب على السؤال دا بالضبط كدا. كلنا تقريبين في السؤال دا وفي غيره من اسئلة كثيرة. الجواب هو المصطنع في أغلب الأحوال وليس السؤال! ياخي حتى السؤال الغبي، الواحد بيتمرمط أمامه. لذلك سؤال الضهبان دا هو موئل الغناء والشعر الكاذب والبطولات! ومن الناس من يحاول أن يغشك! إنهم أهل الاجابات الذين تتكوّر ذواتهم في نهايات الأسطر، مدلهّمة. نقطة سطر جديد! - هوي انت هه! يعني شايل ليك اجابة كدا وفرحان بيها، قايل السؤال مات!؟ دعني أقول لك: جميع الأسئلة التي سمعت والتي لم تسمع بها، جميعها تتمتع بخلود مطلق! السؤال فيهو حيوية والاجابة ديمة نايصة. السؤال بيخلع وجامد. الجواب هو ختة النَفَس، التقية من عصف المشاعر. السؤال، أي سؤال، فيهو قوة، فيهو شواظ وبيطقطق زي قندول عيش ريف معذّب. الاج…

جليد نساي، المقال كامللاً

جليد نسّاي
قراءة في رواية الرجل الخراب
تأليف عبد العزيز بركة ساكن بقلم مصطفى مدثر
الجزء الأول

أيها القارئ المرائي، يا شبيهي، يا أخي - بودلير، شاعر فرنسي الفكرة الرئيسة [عند إليوت] هي أننا، حتى ونحن ملزمون بأن نعي ماضوية الماضي..، لا نملك طريقة عادلة لحجر الماضي عن الحاضر. إن الماضي والحاضر متفاعمان، كلٌ يشي بالآخر ويوحي به، وبالمعنى المثالي كلياً الذي ينتويه إليوت ، فإن كلاً منهما يتعايش مع الآخر. ما يقترحه ت س  إليوت بإيجاز هو رؤيا للتراث الأدبي لا يوجهها كلياً التعاقب الزمني، رغم أنها تحترم هذا التعاقب. لا الماضي ولا الحاضر، ولا أي شاعر أو فنان، يملك معنىً كاملاً منفرداً- إدوارد سعيد، أستاذ الأدب الإنجليزي الطريق إلى الحقيقة يمر بأرض الوساوس - شانون برودي، عاملة صيدلية.

يبدو مفارقاً، بل غرائبياً، أن تُهرع  لقصيدة ت س إليوت (الأرض الخراب) كي تعينك على فهم استلهام عبد العزيز بركة ساكن لها في كتابة روايته القصيرة، الرجل الخراب. فالمفارقة هي أن القصيدة المكتوبة في 1922، وبما عُرف عنها من تعقيد ووعورة، تحتاج هي نفسها لعشرات الشروحات، لكونها مغرقة في الإحالات لتواريخ وثقافات وأديان، بل ولغات أ…

MovieGlobe: Japan's Version of Romeo and Juliet

Romeo and Juliet (2007) JapanOriginal Article by: Fateh Mirghani-Japan

I have just finished watching the masterpiece of Shakespeare” Romeo and Juliet “in its Japanese version.
The quality of the movie is great and the soundtrack, injected with a little Japanese folklore music, has given it a sensational dimension and Eastern fascination!
Basically, the theme of the movie remains the same as the original play, and that has been a particular Japanese notion in dealing with other nations’ cultural products. Part of the reason may lay in Japan's sensitivity to other nations’cultural products- given the long standing historical disputes with its neighbours, and part of it may lay in a fierce sense of homogeneity that has come to characterize Japan as an island nation-state since time immemorial. Thus the Japanese, unlike the Americans, don’t seem to have the temerity to ‘Japanize’ others’ cultural stuff. The movie “Renaissance man”  can be cited as an example of American boldness. The …